Contents

• Never Heard of Fabric?

  • First Spend 15 Seconds Here

  • Then Imagine the Possibilities Here

  • Project Explainer

  • Then Check It Out on GitHub

• Installation

• Basic Commands

  • Help

  • Pattern List

  • Model List

• Create_Threat_Model

  • Input with echo

  • Output

    • Terminal

    • Open as Markmap

    • Export as HTML

    • View in Browser

    • Or use Chat GPT for formatting

  • More Background on create_threat_model by Daniel M …

• Create_threat_scenarios

  • Input with echo

  • Output

• Create_stride_threat_model

  • Input with pbpaste

    • Clipboard contents

    • Terminal Input

  • Output

• Extract_wisdom

  • Using Helper Apps

  • Input with YouTube URL

  • Output

Never Heard of Fabric?

First Spend 15 Seconds Here

Then Imagine the Possibilities Here

Project Explainer

Then Check It Out on GitHub

Pretty inspiring, eh?!

Installation

Basic Commands

Help

fabric -h

usage: fabric -h
Usage:
  fabric [OPTIONS]

Application Options:
  -p, --pattern=                    Choose a pattern
  -v, --variable=                   Values for pattern variables, e.g. -v=$name:John -v=$age:30
  -C, --context=                    Choose a context
      --session=                    Choose a session
  -S, --setup                       Run setup
      --setup-skip-update-patterns  Skip update patterns at setup
  -t, --temperature=                Set temperature (default: 0.7)
  -T, --topp=                       Set top P (default: 0.9)
  -s, --stream                      Stream
  -P, --presencepenalty=            Set presence penalty (default: 0.0)
  -F, --frequencypenalty=           Set frequency penalty (default: 0.0)
  -l, --listpatterns                List all patterns
  -L, --listmodels                  List all available models
  -x, --listcontexts                List all contexts
  -X, --listsessions                List all sessions
  -U, --updatepatterns              Update patterns
  -c, --copy                        Copy to clipboard
  -m, --model=                      Choose model
  -o, --output=                     Output to file
  -n, --latest=                     Number of latest patterns to list (default: 0)
  -d, --changeDefaultModel          Change default pattern
  -y, --youtube=                    YouTube video url to grab transcript, comments from it and send to chat
      --transcript                  Grab transcript from YouTube video and send to chat
      --comments                    Grab comments from YouTube video and send to chat
      --dry-run                     Show what would be sent to the model without actually sending it

Help Options:
  -h, --help                        Show this help message

Pattern List

fabric -l

agility_story
ai
analyze_answers
analyze_cfp_submission
analyze_claims
analyze_debate
analyze_email_headers
analyze_incident
analyze_interviewer_techniques
analyze_logs
...

Model List

fabric --listmodels

GPT Models:
gpt-3.5-turbo
gpt-3.5-turbo-0125
gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
gpt-3.5-turbo-16k
gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct
gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct-0914
gpt-4
gpt-4-0125-preview
gpt-4-0613
gpt-4-1106-preview
gpt-4-turbo
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
gpt-4-turbo-preview
gpt-4o
gpt-4o-2024-05-13
gpt-4o-2024-08-06
gpt-4o-mini
gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18

Local Models:

Claude Models:
claude-3-opus-20240229
claude-3-sonnet-20240229
claude-3-haiku-20240307
claude-2.1

Create_Threat_Model

Input with echo

echo "personal email without MFA" | fabric -p create_threat_model -s -o personal_email

Output

Terminal

# THREAT MODEL

| Scenario                                                      | Impact (1-1000) | Likelihood (1-100%) | Risk (Impact x Likelihood) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------|----------------------------|
| Email account gets hacked by a random attacker                | 700             | 30%                 | 210                        |
| Email account gets hacked by someone you know                 | 500             | 20%                 | 100                        |
| Sensitive information is leaked from the email account        | 800             | 25%                 | 200                        |
| Account used to send spam or phishing emails                  | 600             | 40%                 | 240                        |
| Account is locked due to suspicious activity                  | 300             | 50%                 | 150                        |
| Email provider suffers a data breach                          | 900             | 10%                 | 90                         |

# THREAT MODEL ANALYSIS

- Evaluate the value of your email account's contents.
- Consider the likelihood of each scenario occurring realistically.
- Assess the impact of each scenario on your personal life.
- Calculate risk by multiplying impact and likelihood.
- Focus on high-risk scenarios with feasible defenses.
- Implement controls to reduce impact or likelihood.
- Consider enabling MFA to mitigate most scenarios.
- Balance security measures with convenience and usability.
- Regularly update passwords and monitor account activity.
- Stay informed about new threats and adjust defenses accordingly.%           

Open as Markmap

Export as HTML

View in Browser

Or use Chat GPT for formatting

make this a table # THREAT MODEL

| Scenario                                                      | Impact (1-1000) | Likelihood (1-100%) | Risk (Impact x Likelihood) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------------|----------------------------|
| Email account gets hacked by a random attacker                | 700             | 30%                 | 210                        |
| Email account gets hacked by someone you know                 | 500             | 20%                 | 100                        |
| Sensitive information is leaked from the email account        | 800             | 25%                 | 200                        |
| Account used to send spam or phishing emails                  | 600             | 40%                 | 240                        |
| Account is locked due to suspicious activity                  | 300             | 50%                 | 150                        |
| Email provider suffers a data breach                          | 900             | 10%                 | 90                         |

More Background on create_threat_model by Daniel Miessler

The pattern contents and it’s name changed to create_threat_scenarios so you won’t find it in the pattern list on GitHub anymore. But the prompt is in the GitHub commit history and here’s a copy you can use to make a customer pattern.

Instructions to make a custom pattern are here: https://github.com/danielmiessler/fabric/blob/main/README.md#custom-patterns

# IDENTITY and PURPOSE

You are an expert in risk and threat management and cybersecurity. You specialize in creating simple, narrative-based, threat models for all types of scenarios—from physical security concerns to application security analysis.

Take a deep breath and think step-by-step about how best to achieve this using the steps below.

# THREAT MODEL ESSAY BY DANIEL MIESSLER

Everyday Threat Modeling

Threat modeling is a superpower. When done correctly it gives you the ability to adjust your defensive behaviors based on what you’re facing in real-world scenarios. And not just for applications, or networks, or a business—but for life.
The Difference Between Threats and Risks
This type of threat modeling is a life skill, not just a technical skill. It’s a way to make decisions when facing multiple stressful options—a universal tool for evaluating how you should respond to danger.
Threat Modeling is a way to think about any type of danger in an organized way.
The problem we have as humans is that opportunity is usually coupled with risk, so the question is one of which opportunities should you take and which should you pass on. And If you want to take a certain risk, which controls should you put in place to keep the risk at an acceptable level?
Most people are bad at responding to slow-effect danger because they don’t properly weigh the likelihood of the bad scenarios they’re facing. They’re too willing to put KGB poisoning and neighborhood-kid-theft in the same realm of likelihood. This grouping is likely to increase your stress level to astronomical levels as you imagine all the different things that could go wrong, which can lead to unwise defensive choices.
To see what I mean, let’s look at some common security questions.
This has nothing to do with politics.
Example 1: Defending Your House
Many have decided to protect their homes using alarm systems, better locks, and guns. Nothing wrong with that necessarily, but the question is how much? When do you stop? For someone who’s not thinking according to Everyday Threat Modeling, there is potential to get real extreme real fast.
Let’s say you live in a nice suburban neighborhood in North Austin. The crime rate is extremely low, and nobody can remember the last time a home was broken into.
But you’re ex-Military, and you grew up in a bad neighborhood, and you’ve heard stories online of families being taken hostage and hurt or killed. So you sit around with like-minded buddies and contemplate what would happen if a few different scenarios happened:
The house gets attacked by 4 armed attackers, each with at least an AR-15
A Ninja sneaks into your bedroom to assassinate the family, and you wake up just in time to see him in your room
A guy suffering from a meth addiction kicks in the front door and runs away with your TV
Now, as a cybersecurity professional who served in the Military, you have these scenarios bouncing around in your head, and you start contemplating what you’d do in each situation. And how you can be prepared.
Everyone knows under-preparation is bad, but over-preparation can be negative as well.
Well, looks like you might want a hidden knife under each table. At least one hidden gun in each room. Krav Maga training for all your kids starting at 10-years-old. And two modified AR-15’s in the bedroom—one for you and one for your wife.
Every control has a cost, and it’s not always financial.
But then you need to buy the cameras. And go to additional CQB courses for room to room combat. And you spend countless hours with your family drilling how to do room-to-room combat with an armed assailant. Also, you’ve been preparing like this for years, and you’ve spent 187K on this so far, which could have gone towards college.
Now. It’s not that it’s bad to be prepared. And if this stuff was all free, and safe, there would be fewer reasons not to do it. The question isn’t whether it’s a good idea. The question is whether it’s a good idea given:
The value of what you’re protecting (family, so a lot)
The chances of each of these scenarios given your current environment (low chances of Ninja in Suburbia)
The cost of the controls, financially, time-wise, and stress-wise (worth considering)
The key is being able to take each scenario and play it out as if it happened.
If you get attacked by 4 armed and trained people with Military weapons, what the hell has lead up to that? And should you not just move to somewhere safer? Or maybe work to make whoever hates you that much, hate you less? And are you and your wife really going to hold them off with your two weapons along with the kids in their pajamas?
Think about how irresponsible you’d feel if that thing happened, and perhaps stress less about it if it would be considered a freak event.
That and the Ninja in your bedroom are not realistic scenarios. Yes, they could happen, but would people really look down on you for being killed by a Ninja in your sleep. They’re Ninjas.
Think about it another way: what if Russian Mafia decided to kidnap your 4th grader while she was walking home from school. They showed up with a van full of commandos and snatched her off the street for ransom (whatever).
Would you feel bad that you didn’t make your child’s school route resistant to Russian Special Forces? You’d probably feel like that emotionally, of course, but it wouldn’t be logical.
Maybe your kids are allergic to bee stings and you just don’t know yet.
Again, your options for avoiding this kind of attack are possible but ridiculous. You could home-school out of fear of Special Forces attacking kids while walking home. You could move to a compound with guard towers and tripwires, and have your kids walk around in beekeeper protection while wearing a gas mask.
Being in a constant state of worry has its own cost.
If you made a list of everything bad that could happen to your family while you sleep, or to your kids while they go about their regular lives, you’d be in a mental institution and/or would spend all your money on weaponry and their Sarah Connor training regiment.
This is why Everyday Threat Modeling is important—you have to factor in the probability of threat scenarios and weigh the cost of the controls against the impact to daily life.
Example 2: Using a VPN
A lot of people are confused about VPNs. They think it’s giving them security that it isn’t because they haven’t properly understood the tech and haven’t considered the attack scenarios.
If you log in at the end website you’ve identified yourself to them, regardless of VPN.
VPNs encrypt the traffic between you and some endpoint on the internet, which is where your VPN is based. From there, your traffic then travels without the VPN to its ultimate destination. And then—and this is the part that a lot of people miss—it then lands in some application, like a website. At that point you start clicking and browsing and doing whatever you do, and all those events could be logged or tracked by that entity or anyone who has access to their systems.
It is not some stealth technology that makes you invisible online, because if invisible people type on a keyboard the letters still show up on the screen.
Now, let’s look at who we’re defending against if you use a VPN.
Your ISP. If your VPN includes all DNS requests and traffic then you could be hiding significantly from your ISP. This is true. They’d still see traffic amounts, and there are some technologies that allow people to infer the contents of encrypted connections, but in general this is a good control if you’re worried about your ISP.
The Government. If the government investigates you by only looking at your ISP, and you’ve been using your VPN 24-7, you’ll be in decent shape because it’ll just be encrypted traffic to a VPN provider. But now they’ll know that whatever you were doing was sensitive enough to use a VPN at all times. So, probably not a win. Besides, they’ll likely be looking at the places you’re actually visiting as well (the sites you’re going to on the VPN), and like I talked about above, that’s when your cloaking device is useless. You have to de-cloak to fire, basically.
Super Hackers Trying to Hack You. First, I don’t know who these super hackers are, or why they’re trying ot hack you. But if it’s a state-level hacking group (or similar elite level), and you are targeted, you’re going to get hacked unless you stop using the internet and email. It’s that simple. There are too many vulnerabilities in all systems, and these teams are too good, for you to be able to resist for long. You will eventually be hacked via phishing, social engineering, poisoning a site you already frequent, or some other technique. Focus instead on not being targeted.
Script Kiddies. If you are just trying to avoid general hacker-types trying to hack you, well, I don’t even know what that means. Again, the main advantage you get from a VPN is obscuring your traffic from your ISP. So unless this script kiddie had access to your ISP and nothing else, this doesn’t make a ton of sense.
Notice that in this example we looked at a control (the VPN) and then looked at likely attacks it would help with. This is the opposite of looking at the attacks (like in the house scenario) and then thinking about controls. Using Everyday Threat Modeling includes being able to do both.
Example 3: Using Smart Speakers in the House
This one is huge for a lot of people, and it shows the mistake I talked about when introducing the problem. Basically, many are imagining movie-plot scenarios when making the decision to use Alexa or not.
Let’s go through the negative scenarios:
Amazon gets hacked with all your data released
Amazon gets hacked with very little data stolen
A hacker taps into your Alexa and can listen to everything
A hacker uses Alexa to do something from outside your house, like open the garage
Someone inside the house buys something they shouldn’t
alexaspeakers
A quick threat model on using Alexa smart speakers (click for spreadsheet)
If you click on the spreadsheet above you can open it in Google Sheets to see the math. It’s not that complex. The only real nuance is that Impact is measured on a scale of 1-1000 instead of 1-100. The real challenge here is not the math. The challenges are:
Unsupervised Learning — Security, Tech, and AI in 10 minutes…
Get a weekly breakdown of what's happening in security and tech—and why it matters.
Experts can argue on exact settings for all of these, but that doesn’t matter much.
Assigning the value of the feature
Determining the scenarios
Properly assigning probability to the scenarios
The first one is critical. You have to know how much risk you’re willing to tolerate based on how useful that thing is to you, your family, your career, your life. The second one requires a bit of a hacker/creative mind. And the third one requires that you understand the industry and the technology to some degree.
But the absolute most important thing here is not the exact ratings you give—it’s the fact that you’re thinking about this stuff in an organized way!
The Everyday Threat Modeling Methodology
Other versions of the methodology start with controls and go from there.
So, as you can see from the spreadsheet, here’s the methodology I recommend using for Everyday Threat Modeling when you’re asking the question:
Should I use this thing?
Out of 1-100, determine how much value or pleasure you get from the item/feature. That’s your Value.
Make a list of negative/attack scenarios that might make you not want to use it.
Determine how bad it would be if each one of those happened, from 1-1000. That’s your Impact.
Determine the chances of that realistically happening over the next, say, 10 years, as a percent chance. That’s your Likelihood.
Multiply the Impact by the Likelihood for each scenario. That’s your Risk.
Add up all your Risk scores. That’s your Total Risk.
Subtract your Total Risk from your Value. If that number is positive, you are good to go. If that number is negative, it might be too risky to use based on your risk tolerance and the value of the feature.
Note that lots of things affect this, such as you realizing you actually care about this thing a lot more than you thought. Or realizing that you can mitigate some of the risk of one of the attacks by—say—putting your Alexa only in certain rooms and not others (like the bedroom or office). Now calculate how that affects both Impact and Likelihood for each scenario, which will affect Total Risk.
Going the opposite direction
Above we talked about going from Feature –> Attack Scenarios –> Determining if It’s Worth It.
But there’s another version of this where you start with a control question, such as:
What’s more secure, typing a password into my phone, using my fingerprint, or using facial recognition?
Here we’re not deciding whether or not to use a phone. Yes, we’re going to use one. Instead we’re figuring out what type of security is best. And that—just like above—requires us to think clearly about the scenarios we’re facing.
So let’s look at some attacks against your phone:
A Russian Spetztaz Ninja wants to gain access to your unlocked phone
Your 7-year old niece wants to play games on your work phone
Your boyfriend wants to spy on your DMs with other people
Someone in Starbucks is shoulder surfing and being nosy
You accidentally leave your phone in a public place
We won’t go through all the math on this, but the Russian Ninja scenario is really bad. And really unlikely. They’re more likely to steal you and the phone, and quickly find a way to make you unlock it for them. So your security measure isn’t going to help there.
For your niece, kids are super smart about watching you type your password, so she might be able to get into it easily just by watching you do it a couple of times. Same with someone shoulder surfing at Starbucks, but you have to ask yourself who’s going to risk stealing your phone and logging into it at Starbucks. Is this a stalker? A criminal? What type? You have to factor in all those probabilities.
First question, why are you with them?
If your significant other wants to spy on your DMs, well they most definitely have had an opportunity to shoulder surf a passcode. But could they also use your finger while you slept? Maybe face recognition could be the best because it’d be obvious to you?
For all of these, you want to assign values based on how often you’re in those situations. How often you’re in Starbucks, how often you have kids around, how stalkerish your soon-to-be-ex is. Etc.
Once again, the point is to think about this in an organized way, rather than as a mashup of scenarios with no probabilities assigned that you can’t keep straight in your head. Logic vs. emotion.
It’s a way of thinking about danger.
Other examples
Here are a few other examples that you might come across.
Should I put my address on my public website?
How bad is it to be a public figure (blog/YouTube) in 2020?
Do I really need to shred this bill when I throw it away?
Don’t ever think you’ve captured all the scenarios, or that you have a perfect model.
In each of these, and the hundreds of other similar scenarios, go through the methodology. Even if you don’t get to something perfect or precise, you will at least get some clarity in what the problem is and how to think about it.
Summary
Threat Modeling is about more than technical defenses—it’s a way of thinking about risk.
The main mistake people make when considering long-term danger is letting different bad outcomes produce confusion and anxiety.
When you think about defense, start with thinking about what you’re defending, and how valuable it is.
Then capture the exact scenarios you’re worried about, along with how bad it would be if they happened, and what you think the chances are of them happening.
You can then think about additional controls as modifiers to the Impact or Probability ratings within each scenario.
Know that your calculation will never be final; it changes based on your own preferences and the world around you.
The primary benefit of Everyday Threat Modeling is having a semi-formal way of thinking about danger.
Don’t worry about the specifics of your methodology; as long as you capture feature value, scenarios, and impact/probability…you’re on the right path. It’s the exercise that’s valuable.
Notes
I know Threat Modeling is a religion with many denominations. The version of threat modeling I am discussing here is a general approach that can be used for anything from whether to move out of the country due to a failing government, or what appsec controls to use on a web application.

END THREAT MODEL ESSAY

# STEPS

- Fully understand the threat modeling approach captured in the blog above. That is the mentality you use to create threat models.

- Take the input provided and create a section called THREAT MODEL, and under that section create a threat model for various scenarios in which that bad thing could happen in a Markdown table structure that follows the philosophy of the blog post above.

- The threat model should be a set of possible scenarios for the situation happening. The goal is to highlight what's realistic vs. possible, and what's worth defending against vs. what's not, combined with the difficulty of defending against each scenario.

- In a section under that, create a section called THREAT MODEL ANALYSIS, give an explanation of the thought process used to build the threat model using a set of 10-word bullets. The focus should be on helping guide the person to the most logical choice on how to defend against the situation, using the different scenarios as a guide.

# OUTPUT GUIDANCE

For example, if a company is worried about the NSA breaking into their systems, the output should illustrate both through the threat model and also the analysis that the NSA breaking into their systems is an unlikely scenario, and it would be better to focus on other, more likely threats. Plus it'd be hard to defend against anyway.

Same for being attacked by Navy Seals at your suburban home if you're a regular person, or having Blackwater kidnap your kid from school. These are possible but not realistic, and it would be impossible to live your life defending against such things all the time.

The threat model itself and the analysis should emphasize this similar to how it's described in the essay.

# OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS

- You only output valid Markdown.

- Do not use asterisks or other special characters in the output for Markdown formatting. Use Markdown syntax that's more readable in plain text.

- Do not output blank lines or lines full of unprintable / invisible characters. Only output the printable portion of the ASCII art.

# INPUT:

INPUT:

Create_threat_scenarios

Input with echo

echo "remote access to a Research and Development lab environment" | fabric -p create_threat_scenarios

Output

➜  fabric_demo echo "remote access to a Research and Development lab environment" | fabric -p create_threat_scenarios
## THREAT SCENARIOS

- Unauthorized access through weak or stolen credentials.
- Exploitation of unpatched software vulnerabilities.
- Insider threat from disgruntled employees.
- Phishing attacks targeting lab personnel.
- Malware introduced via external devices or downloads.
- Data exfiltration through unsecured network connections.
- Denial of Service (DoS) attacks disrupting lab operations.
- Social engineering attacks to gain sensitive information.
- Misconfigured remote access tools exposing the network.
- Supply chain attacks compromising third-party software.
- Physical theft of devices with remote access capabilities.
- Man-in-the-middle attacks intercepting communications.
- Ransomware encrypting critical research data.
- Unauthorized access through shared or public Wi-Fi networks.
- Credential stuffing attacks using leaked passwords.

## THREAT MODEL ANALYSIS

- Focus on realistic, high-impact scenarios.
- Prioritize likelihood and potential impact of threats.
- Consider both external and internal threat vectors.
- Evaluate existing security measures and their effectiveness.
- Assess the cost and feasibility of implementing controls.
- Balance security with operational efficiency.
- Regularly update threat model based on new intelligence.
- Consider human factors in security breaches.
- Emphasize proactive over reactive security measures.
- Continuously monitor and adapt to evolving threats.

## RECOMMENDED CONTROLS

- Implement multi-factor authentication for all remote access.
- Regularly update and patch all software and systems.
- Conduct regular security awareness training for employees.
- Use endpoint protection to detect and prevent malware.
- Encrypt sensitive data both in transit and at rest.
- Monitor network traffic for unusual activity patterns.
- Restrict remote access to essential personnel only.
- Implement strong password policies and regular audits.
- Use VPNs for secure remote connections.
- Regularly review and update access permissions.

## NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

When considering remote access to a Research and Development lab environment, it's crucial to focus on realistic threats that could significantly impact operations. While the idea of sophisticated state-sponsored attacks might be concerning, the more likely scenarios involve unauthorized access through weak credentials, phishing, or insider threats. These are common attack vectors that can lead to data breaches or operational disruptions. By prioritizing controls like multi-factor authentication, regular software updates, and employee training, you can mitigate these risks effectively. It's important to maintain a balance between security measures and the lab's operational needs, ensuring that security doesn't hinder productivity. Regularly updating your threat model based on new intelligence will help you stay ahead of evolving threats.

## CONCLUSION

Focus on realistic threats like unauthorized access and phishing; implement strong controls like multi-factor authentication and regular updates for effective risk mitigation.
➜  fabric_demo 

Create_stride_threat_model

Input with pbpaste

Clipboard contents

The architecture of an AI chatbot designed for corporate customer support is typically modular and involves multiple layers and components to ensure smooth interaction, data security, scalability, and efficient communication with customers. Here's a high-level breakdown of the core components and architecture:
1. User Interface (UI) Layer

This is the front-end where users interact with the chatbot. It can be deployed across various platforms:

    Web Widget: A chat interface embedded on the company’s website.
    Mobile Integration: Through mobile apps or SMS services.
    Social Media Integration: Chatbots integrated with platforms like Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, etc.

The UI collects user inputs (typically text or voice), presents chatbot responses, and ensures the user experience is seamless and easy to navigate.
2. Natural Language Processing (NLP) Engine

The NLP engine is the core component that processes and understands user queries. It converts the user input (text or voice) into structured data and determines the intent of the message.

    Text Parsing: Breaks down user inputs into tokens or words.
    Intent Recognition: Identifies the purpose of the user's message (e.g., "track my order," "product inquiry").
    Entity Recognition: Detects key entities in the text such as product names, dates, or order numbers.

The most popular frameworks for NLP include SpaCy, NLTK, and platforms like Google Dialogflow, Microsoft LUIS, or IBM Watson.
3. Machine Learning Models

To ensure the chatbot learns and improves over time, machine learning models can be employed to predict the best responses based on historical interactions.

    Supervised Learning: The chatbot can be trained using labeled datasets to handle common queries.
    Reinforcement Learning: Over time, the chatbot improves by learning from user interactions and feedback.
    Transfer Learning: Using pre-trained models (like GPT, BERT) that have learned general language understanding and fine-tuning them on the company-specific data.

4. Dialogue Management System

The dialogue management system manages the flow of conversation and determines what response or action should be taken next. Components of this layer include:

    Context Management: Keeps track of the conversation’s context to maintain relevant and coherent responses.
    Response Generation: Based on the user’s intent, the chatbot will either provide a pre-scripted answer or dynamically generate one.
    Fallback Handling: If the bot doesn't understand the user's query, it escalates to a human agent or provides a relevant fallback message.

5. Back-End Integration

For customer support, the chatbot needs access to corporate databases and services to retrieve or update information.

    CRM Integration: The chatbot should connect with the company's Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot) to access customer data.
    Inventory or Order Management: If users inquire about products or order statuses, the chatbot interacts with backend systems like ERP or inventory management.
    API Layer: The back-end integration is typically handled by an API that allows the chatbot to securely query databases and external services for information.

6. Knowledge Base

The chatbot needs access to a knowledge base that contains information on FAQs, troubleshooting guides, and product or service details.

    Static FAQs: Pre-defined answers to frequently asked questions.
    Dynamic Knowledge: Use of AI to mine documents, articles, and product manuals to dynamically generate answers.

7. Security Layer

Given the importance of data privacy, especially in a corporate setting, robust security measures need to be implemented.

    Authentication: Secure login mechanisms (OAuth, Single Sign-On) to ensure that only authorized users can access sensitive data.
    Data Encryption: All communication between the chatbot, users, and backend systems should be encrypted (using SSL/TLS).
    Compliance: Ensuring compliance with data regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, or industry-specific standards (e.g., PCI DSS for payment information).

8. Analytics and Monitoring

Monitoring the chatbot’s performance is critical to understanding its effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement.

    User Analytics: Track customer queries, chatbot success rates, response times, etc.
    Training Data Feedback: Continuously update the chatbot's training data based on new user interactions to improve its understanding of user intent.

9. Escalation to Human Agents

In complex or sensitive cases, the chatbot should seamlessly transition the conversation to a human agent.

    Live Chat Handover: When the chatbot cannot handle a query, it routes the conversation to a live agent, passing along the conversation history.
    Ticketing System: If no live agents are available, the chatbot can create a support ticket for follow-up.

10. Deployment Infrastructure

The architecture is typically deployed on scalable infrastructure to ensure reliability.

    Cloud-Based Infrastructure: Platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure to ensure scalability and flexibility.
    Serverless Architecture: This helps in auto-scaling the services based on load without managing the underlying infrastructure.
    Containerization: Using tools like Docker and Kubernetes for easy deployment, scaling, and updating of the chatbot across environments.

Terminal Input

pbpaste | fabric -p create_stride_threat_model -s -o chatbot_threat_model.md

Output

Extract_wisdom

Using Helper Apps

Input with YouTube URL

yt https://youtu.be/onZOJvQ0g7s | fabric -p extract_wisdom -s

Output

# SUMMARY

Steve and Dr. Gerald Oer discuss GRC, cybersecurity education, and the Simply Cyber Academy's courses, emphasizing risk management and engaging learning methods.

# IDEAS

- GRC professionals often face stereotypes as non-technical, clipboard-carrying auditors.
- Cybersecurity frameworks like NIST are crucial for building robust security programs.
- Simply Cyber Academy offers courses to advance careers in GRC and cybersecurity.
- Dr. Gerald Oer integrates pop culture, like Game of Thrones, into cybersecurity education.
- Understanding the full scope of tools like Fabric is essential before integration.
- GRC is less technical but still vital in cybersecurity operations.
- Cybersecurity education should be engaging to improve retention and understanding.
- Risk management is central to GRC and cybersecurity decision-making.
- Simply Cyber Academy has a large community with daily cyber threat briefings.
- Cybersecurity conferences offer exciting topics compared to other fields like accounting.
- GRC education fills a gap in the market for comprehensive cybersecurity training.
- The Simply Cyber Academy's courses are accessible to diverse backgrounds.
- Cybersecurity frameworks are adaptable to different business needs and sizes.
- GRC knowledge is valuable across various cybersecurity roles and industries.
- Continuous learning and adaptation are crucial in the evolving field of cybersecurity.
- Engaging storytelling can make complex cybersecurity concepts more relatable.
- Cybersecurity education should focus on practical, hands-on experience.
- Understanding business objectives is key to effective cybersecurity strategy.
- GRC professionals help businesses prioritize spending on risk reduction.
- Cybersecurity frameworks like CSF are recognized globally for their effectiveness.
- Simply Cyber Academy emphasizes inclusivity and community in its approach.
- Cybersecurity education should align with real-world business challenges and needs.
- GRC professionals play a crucial role in managing business risks effectively.
- Cybersecurity frameworks provide a structured approach to security operations.
- Simply Cyber Academy's courses offer both foundational and advanced cybersecurity knowledge.
- Engaging with diverse backgrounds enriches the cybersecurity community.

# INSIGHTS

- GRC's role in cybersecurity is undervalued yet crucial for risk management and business alignment.
- Engaging storytelling enhances learning retention in complex subjects like cybersecurity.
- Understanding business objectives is essential for effective cybersecurity strategies.
- Cybersecurity frameworks offer adaptable solutions for diverse business needs.
- Continuous learning is vital in the rapidly evolving field of cybersecurity.
- GRC professionals bridge technical and business aspects of cybersecurity effectively.
- Practical, hands-on experience is crucial for comprehensive cybersecurity education.
- Inclusivity and community engagement enrich the cybersecurity learning experience.
- Risk management is central to GRC's contribution to business security decisions.
- Diverse backgrounds bring valuable perspectives to the cybersecurity field.

# QUOTES

- "GRC people are getting kind of dunked on as nerds or clipboard carrying auditors."
- "Cyber Academy is the go-to for GRC for my money."
- "The Cyber resilience course is excellent."
- "Game of Thrones like it's a perfect opportunity."
- "Simply Cyber has become... heartwarming that we've been able to help so many people."
- "Fabric is like so right on my radar."
- "I want to understand the full scope, the full comprehensive picture of what's possible."
- "GRC is less technical than other dimensions of cyber security."
- "Risk is the heart and center of GRC."
- "Simply Cyber Academy is the best place for GRC."
- "Cybersecurity frameworks like NIST are crucial for building robust security programs."
- "Understanding business objectives is key to effective cybersecurity strategy."
- "Cybersecurity education should be engaging to improve retention and understanding."
- "GRC professionals help businesses prioritize spending on risk reduction."
- "Continuous learning and adaptation are crucial in the evolving field of cybersecurity."

# HABITS

- Integrating pop culture references into educational content enhances engagement and retention.
- Understanding the full scope of new tools before integrating them into workflows.
- Reading instruction manuals thoroughly before starting new tasks or projects.
- Engaging with diverse backgrounds enriches personal and professional growth.
- Continuously learning and adapting to new developments in cybersecurity.
- Prioritizing risk management as a central focus in cybersecurity decision-making.
- Emphasizing inclusivity and community engagement in professional endeavors.
- Aligning cybersecurity strategies with real-world business objectives and challenges.
- Bridging technical and business aspects effectively in professional roles.

# FACTS

- GRC professionals often face stereotypes as non-technical auditors in cybersecurity.
- Cybersecurity frameworks like NIST provide structured approaches to security operations.
- Simply Cyber Academy offers courses to advance careers in GRC and cybersecurity fields.
- Engaging storytelling can enhance learning retention in complex subjects like cybersecurity.
- Risk management is central to GRC's contribution to business security decisions.
- Continuous learning is vital in the rapidly evolving field of cybersecurity today.
- GRC professionals bridge technical and business aspects of cybersecurity effectively.

# REFERENCES

- Simply Cyber Academy
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework
- Game of Thrones
- Fabric (AI tool)
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Cloe
- Mid Journey
- GitHub
- Python
- Daniel Misler
- South Carolina law enforcement division
- CIS Top 20 Controls
- ISO 27001 Standard

# ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY

Engaging storytelling and comprehensive frameworks enhance cybersecurity education, bridging technical skills with business objectives effectively.

# RECOMMENDATIONS

- Integrate pop culture references into educational content for enhanced engagement and retention.
- Understand the full scope of new tools before integrating them into workflows effectively.
- Engage with diverse backgrounds to enrich personal and professional growth opportunities.
- Continuously learn and adapt to new developments in the rapidly evolving field of cybersecurity.
- Prioritize risk management as a central focus in all cybersecurity decision-making processes.%